How to Draft a Strong Offshore Trust Deed

A well-drafted offshore trust deed can do two things others can’t: actually work under pressure, and stay workable for decades as your family’s needs change. I’ve reviewed dozens that looked fine at a distance but fell apart on detail—ambiguous powers, unsafe reserved rights, or distribution provisions that led to fights. This guide focuses on the practical drafting decisions that make the difference: which jurisdiction to choose, what powers to grant (and to whom), how to write distribution standards that won’t invite litigation, and how to future‑proof the trust without turning it into a control mechanism that a court can ignore. If you want a deed that stands up in court, delivers tax clarity, and gives your trustees a realistic playbook, read on.

What an Offshore Trust Deed Actually Does

A trust deed is the operating system of your offshore trust. It sets the governing law, defines the assets that form the trust fund, appoints the decision‑makers (trustees, protectors, and sometimes an enforcer), defines who may benefit, and allocates powers for investments, distributions, amendments, and succession. Offshore simply means the trust is governed by a non‑domestic jurisdiction—often one with neutral tax treatment, sophisticated trust statutes, and “firewall” provisions that protect against foreign judgments, forced heirship, and marital claims.

The trust relationship still hinges on core principles: the trustee owes fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries, and the deed cannot override those fiduciary obligations beyond what the governing law permits. Strong deeds harness local statute to tailor duties and powers, but they avoid steps that collapse the structure (for example, giving the settlor de facto control). Think of the deed as the constitution; letters of wishes and trustee policies are the legislation and regulations that sit beneath it.

Choosing the Right Jurisdiction

You can write a textbook‑perfect deed and still fail if the jurisdiction doesn’t support what you’re trying to achieve. When I help families choose, we start with five filters:

  • Legal infrastructure and case law: Mature trust jurisprudence, specialist courts, and experienced trustees. Strong options: Jersey, Guernsey, Cayman, Bermuda, BVI, Isle of Man, Bahamas. For high‑octane asset protection, Cook Islands and Nevis are often used.
  • Protective statutes: Look for firewall provisions (shielding from forced heirship and foreign judgments), modern trust codes, recognition of non‑charitable purpose trusts, and explicit validation of reserved powers. VISTA (BVI) and STAR (Cayman) are powerful examples for specific use cases.
  • Practicality: Trustee availability, fees, responsiveness, language, and the ability to onboard complex assets. Time zones matter when your CFO needs a signature in hours, not days.
  • Privacy and reporting: Most reputable jurisdictions participate in CRS; more than 100 jurisdictions now exchange information automatically. Some keep beneficial owner registers non‑public. Know how beneficiary information may be shared with tax authorities, not just courts.
  • Duration and flexibility: Unlimited duration is available in several jurisdictions (e.g., Jersey, Guernsey, Cayman), which helps with dynastic planning. Others cap duration or require perpetuity elections.

Two useful distinctions:

  • Business‑holding trusts: If you plan to hold an operating company, consider BVI VISTA or a Cayman trust with a strong anti‑Bartlett clause so trustees aren’t obliged to interfere in day‑to‑day management.
  • Asset‑protection emphasis: If you’re at risk of creditor claims, jurisdictions with short limitation periods for fraudulent transfer claims and high burdens of proof (e.g., Cook Islands, Nevis) can add resilience—but only if the trust is settled well before any claim is foreseeable.

Decide on Trust Type and Structure

Different goals call for different deed architecture.

  • Discretionary family trust: The workhorse for multi‑jurisdictional families. Trustees decide who benefits, when, and how. Use for estate planning, asset protection, and long‑term stewardship.
  • Fixed interest or life interest trust: Useful where you want guaranteed income for a spouse or parent, with capital protected for children. Less flexible, but sometimes necessary for tax reasons.
  • Purpose trusts: Non‑charitable purpose trusts (e.g., Cayman STAR; Jersey/Guernsey purpose trusts) can hold voting shares of a family company, a private trust company (PTC), or a trophy asset under an “enforcer” rather than beneficiaries. Ideal for governance structures.
  • VISTA trusts (BVI): Designed for holding controlling shares in an underlying company without dragging trustees into business management, while still preserving oversight at the “meta” level.
  • Private trust company (PTC) structures: For families who want a say in trustee decisions, a PTC can act as trustee of one or more family trusts, with board seats occupied by trusted advisers and family members. Pair with a purpose trust that owns the PTC to avoid personal control concerns.

Choose structure first, then draft the deed to suit—don’t try to shoehorn a commercial business into a plain‑vanilla discretionary deed that expects a portfolio of ETFs.

Pre‑Drafting Diligence and Tax Clearances

Drafting starts with facts:

  • Source of wealth and AML/KYC: Trustees will ask for corroboration—sale agreements, bank statements, audited financials. A thorough pack speeds onboarding.
  • Tax analysis in home countries: Understand settlor, trustee, and beneficiary tax angles. The US, UK, Canada, Spain, France, and Australia have detailed rules on foreign trusts. For example, US persons often prefer grantor trusts for income tax transparency; UK settlor‑interested trusts create income tax charges and matching rules for distributions.
  • Reporting status: Determine whether the trust will be a financial institution (FI) under CRS/FATCA (common if it hires a professional manager) or a passive NFE. Reporting obligations change accordingly.
  • Asset map: Identify assets to be settled, their situs, liens, transfer restrictions, and valuation. Many issues originate from trying to transfer restricted shares or real estate with unnoticed mortgage covenants.

Get the roadblocks on the table early; it keeps you from drafting powers you can’t practically use.

Core Components of a Strong Deed

Parties and Definitions

Be precise about who is who:

  • Settlor: Consider whether to name a principal settlor plus nominal settlors for later additions, or to allow “any person” to add property with trustee consent. If tax is a concern, think about excluding the settlor from benefit and reserving minimal powers.
  • Trustees: Name at least one licensed professional trustee, or your PTC. Build in a process for adding/removing trustees and for handling trustee insolvency or resignation.
  • Protector or Appointor: The person or committee with oversight powers (e.g., to appoint/remove trustees, approve distributions, or consent to amendments). Clarify whether their powers are fiduciary and the standard of care applied. Excessive settlor control via a protector role can sink the trust; draft carefully.
  • Beneficiaries: Define classes and include clear default and ultimate default (gift‑over) provisions. Consider a wide class initially, with power to exclude individuals later. Think about unborns and adopted children, and define “issue” and “spouse” to avoid disputes.
  • Enforcer (for purpose trusts): A distinct role required by law in some jurisdictions to ensure the trustee carries out the non‑charitable purpose.

Precision in definitions avoids many interpretive fights. Define “Trust Fund,” “Income,” “Capital,” “Distribution,” “Majority,” and “Independent Trustee” with clarity.

Trust Fund and Additions

Settle a meaningful initial sum under the chosen governing law, then add assets as they are cleared.

  • Further settlements: Allow additions from any person with trustee consent, and whether they are earmarked into separate sub‑funds.
  • Segregation: Include power to maintain separate accounts or “silo” assets for administrative or liability containment reasons. This helps when some assets have specific risks.
  • Loans vs contributions: Make the distinction explicit. Loans should be documented with terms, security, and ranking, or you risk recharacterization.
  • Records: Require the trustee to keep a schedule of contributions and their source. Useful for tracing and for tax matching rules in several jurisdictions.

Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Dispute Resolution

Three distinct elements:

  • Governing law: Select a jurisdiction with a modern trust statute and firewall protections. Include a clause incorporating any statutory “opt‑ins” your jurisdiction allows (e.g., excluding rule in Hastings‑Bass exposure if permitted by statute).
  • Forum selection: Decide whether the courts of the governing law have exclusive jurisdiction. In cross‑border families, an arbitration clause (or a bespoke family dispute resolution process) can be valuable, but ensure local law allows arbitration of trust disputes. Some jurisdictions now have dedicated trust arbitration regimes.
  • Change of law and situs: Include power to change governing law, migrate trusteeship, and transfer administration if circumstances shift. Pair this with a “duress” or “flight” clause that permits relocation if the trustee faces coercion or adverse legal change.

Trustee Powers and Duties

This is where draftsmanship earns its keep. I focus on four threads:

  • Investment powers: Grant wide powers to invest as if absolute owner, including derivatives, private funds, and concentrated positions. Confirm power to employ managers, delegate under statutory regimes, and hold assets via nominees or custodians.
  • Business assets and Anti‑Bartlett: If you hold a company, include an Anti‑Bartlett clause to reduce trustees’ duty to intervene in management, unless they receive red‑flag information. For BVI VISTA, the statute does this for you—but you still need to draft “office of director rules” if you want trustees to hold directorships or to opt out of them.
  • Standard of care and exculpation: Professional trustees require a clear standard (often gross negligence/wilful default carve‑out). Align indemnity with the exculpation language and governing law. Avoid overreaching: courts strike down clauses that purport to excuse fraud or dishonesty.
  • Fees, expenses, and charging clauses: Allow professional charging, including for directors’ fees in underlying companies if appropriate. Confirm reimbursement of properly incurred expenses and the right to create reserves.

A practical extra: a power to maintain illiquid assets without regard to diversification, to avoid breach claims when holding a family business or real estate.

Distribution Provisions

Distribution mechanics shape family dynamics. Decide between a narrow “HEMS” standard (health, education, maintenance, support) or a fully discretionary regime.

  • Pure discretion: Trustees may distribute income and/or capital to any beneficiary in a class, in any proportion, at any time. Combine with a thoughtful letter of wishes to guide decisions.
  • Entitlement traps: Avoid creating fixed entitlements that trigger Saunders v Vautier rights (allowing beneficiaries to collapse the trust if all are adult and agree). If you want clawbacks for divorces, insolvency, or addiction, write them expressly.
  • Default and ultimate default: Provide a default beneficiary class if no appointment is made by a certain date, and a final gift‑over to charity if the trust ends with no eligible beneficiaries.
  • Spendthrift and anti‑alienation: Bar assignment, pledging, or anticipation of interests. Include “no‑contest” language that reduces or eliminates a beneficiary’s interest if they mount hostile litigation, within the limits of local law.

Protector/Appointor Mechanics

Protectors can strengthen governance or turn a trust into an illusion—your drafting decides which.

  • Scope: Common protector powers include appointing/removing trustees, consenting to distributions above thresholds, approving amendments, and changing governing law. Prefer negative consent (veto) over active management powers.
  • Fiduciary character: State whether powers are fiduciary. Many jurisdictions default to fiduciary; if you want non‑fiduciary powers, make that explicit and consider safeguards.
  • Independence: If the settlor serves as protector, reserve minimal powers and add an independent co‑protector. Better yet, use a committee with at least one independent member.
  • Succession and incapacity: Provide a clear line of succession and a mechanism to verify incapacity to avoid power vacuums.

Reserved Powers to the Settlor

Statutes in several jurisdictions permit reserving certain powers without invalidating the trust (e.g., to add/remove beneficiaries, direct investments, or appoint/remove trustees). The cautionary tales—Pugachev, Webb, and more recently Grand View—show what happens when a settlor retains practical control. My rules of thumb:

  • Keep investment directions via an investment committee or manager, not the settlor directly.
  • If you reserve a power to add or exclude beneficiaries, make it special (limited) rather than general, and add a protector consent gate.
  • Avoid reserving distribution powers to the settlor. Use a letter of wishes and protector oversight instead.
  • Expressly state that reserved powers do not create a duty to exercise them and that their exercise must not render the trust illusory.

Beneficiary Additions, Exclusions, and Powers of Appointment

Flexibility without abuse:

  • Addition/exclusion: Allow the trustee or a power holder to add or exclude beneficiaries, with protector consent. Record exclusions formally to avoid later disputes.
  • Powers of appointment: Grant a special power to appoint among a defined class. Be explicit that appointees can be appointed on new trusts with similar or more restrictive terms (decanting by appointment).
  • Tax awareness: Adding a US person or UK resident can drag the trust into new regimes. Include a “tax beneficiary” filter allowing the trustee to suspend distributions where adverse tax consequences would arise.

Variation, Decanting, and Administrative Flexibility

Build safe adaptability:

  • Trustee amendment power: Allow amendments to administrative provisions with protector consent, but require court approval or unanimous beneficiary approval for core beneficial changes unless a statutory variation route is used.
  • Decanting: If local law provides a decanting regime, incorporate it by reference and add an express power to resettle assets onto a new trust with substantially similar terms.
  • Partition and merger: Permit trustees to split or combine trusts, create sub‑trusts, and convert from discretionary to fixed share sub‑funds for specific beneficiaries.

Confidentiality and Information Rights

Schmidt v Rosewood set the tone: beneficiaries have a right to seek information, supervised by the court. Draft with that in mind:

  • Define classes with information rights (e.g., primary vs. remote beneficiaries) and the scope (accounts, trust deed, letters of wishes).
  • Give trustees discretion to restrict disclosure where harm may result (e.g., to vulnerable beneficiaries or in the context of extortion risk).
  • Treat letters of wishes as confidential guidance, not binding instructions. Include language acknowledging their non‑binding nature while authorizing trustees to rely on them.

Asset Protection Features

No drafting can cure a fraudulent transfer, but a good deed helps:

  • Settlor solvency statement and solvency warranty at settlement.
  • Duress clause: Provisions allowing trustees to ignore instructions given under coercion or to relocate administration if threats arise.
  • Spendthrift clauses as above, and explicit prohibition on pledging interests.
  • Lookback awareness: Creditors in some jurisdictions have 2–6 years to challenge transfers; settle early and consider staged funding.

Tax‑Sensitive Clauses

A few clauses save pain later:

  • Tax reimbursement: If the settlor is taxed on trust income (e.g., US grantor trusts), permit trustees to reimburse taxes. In the US this has estate tax implications if misused; tailor the clause to your scenario.
  • Gross‑up mechanics: Where withholding taxes or imputation credits arise, allow trustees to equalize distributions.
  • Tax indemnities and classifications: Authorize trustees to classify the trust under CRS/FATCA, collect self‑certifications, and withhold where required.

Reporting and Compliance

Draft operational authority as well as obligations:

  • CRS/FATCA: Authorize disclosure to competent authorities, require beneficiaries to provide tax information, and permit suspension of distributions for non‑compliance.
  • Record‑keeping: Mandate robust books and records, document retention periods, and electronic records as originals where legal.
  • Audits: Allow trustees to appoint auditors and share reports with protectors and relevant beneficiaries.

Term and Perpetuity

  • Duration: Elect an unlimited term where permitted, or specify a long period (e.g., 150 years). If you retain a perpetuity period, ensure powers of appointment and decanting respect it.
  • Triggered termination: Give trustees power to wind up sub‑trusts that become too small to administer efficiently and to consolidate funds.

Execution and Formalities

  • Execution: Follow local execution formalities, including witnessing, notaries if needed, and dating conventions. If the settlor is onshore, avoid steps that create a local situs for the trust at inception unless intentional.
  • Stamp and registry: Some assets or jurisdictions require stamping or registration. Give trustees express authority to do what’s necessary, including making protective filings without waiving confidentiality where possible.
  • Schedule of assets: Attach an initial schedule, then add supplements for later transfers.

Sample Clause Snippets You Can Adapt

Use these to pressure‑test your drafting with counsel; don’t paste them blind.

  • Anti‑Bartlett language (non‑VISTA):

“The Trustees shall not be under any duty to interfere in the business or management of any company in which the Trust Fund holds an interest, nor to exercise voting or other rights so as to enquire into or supervise the conduct of the company, and shall not be liable for any loss arising by reason only of holding or continuing to hold such interest, unless they have actual knowledge of dishonesty.”

  • Investment power:

“The Trustees may invest the Trust Fund as if they were the absolute owners thereof, without regard to diversification, risk, or the production of income, and may retain any asset for so long as they think fit.”

  • Protector consent (negative consent model):

“Where this Deed requires the Protector’s consent, the Trustees shall give written notice of the proposed action; if the Protector does not object in writing within 30 days, consent shall be deemed given.”

  • Duress clause:

“No power or discretion shall be exercisable to the extent its exercise is, in the opinion of the Trustees, procured by fraud, coercion, or duress; the Trustees may disregard any request or direction they reasonably believe to have been so procured.”

  • Information rights tiering:

“Primary Beneficiaries may request annual trust accounts and a copy of this Deed. Other Beneficiaries shall have no right to trust documents absent the Trustees’ determination, exercised in their absolute discretion, that disclosure is appropriate.”

  • Tax compliance:

“The Trustees may disclose information concerning the Trust to any tax authority as required by law, may require self‑certifications from any Beneficiary or power holder, and may withhold or suspend distributions until compliance is satisfied.”

  • Reimbursement of settlor taxes (US grantor context):

“The Trustees may, but shall not be obliged to, reimburse the Settlor for any income tax paid by the Settlor attributable to the income or gains of the Trust Fund, taking into account liquidity, creditor protection, and the interests of Beneficiaries.”

  • Change of governing law:

“The Trustees may at any time declare that the proper law and forum of administration of this Trust shall be that of another jurisdiction, and thereafter this Trust shall take effect in accordance with the laws of that jurisdiction, provided that the essential validity of dispositions already made shall remain governed by the prior law.”

Step‑by‑Step Drafting Workflow

  • Define objectives and constraints: Asset protection, succession, business continuity, philanthropy, or all of the above. List tax, regulatory, and family constraints plainly.
  • Choose jurisdiction and trust type: Match the objectives to statute (e.g., VISTA for business assets, STAR for purposes).
  • Select the trustee model: Professional trustee, PTC, or co‑trustee structure. Agree service levels and fee model early.
  • Map beneficiaries and governance: Who are primary vs. remote beneficiaries? Who will act as protector? Is an investment committee or enforcer needed?
  • Build the distributions architecture: Pure discretion or defined standards; default and ultimate default provisions; no‑contest language.
  • Set investment and business powers: Anti‑Bartlett vs. statutory regimes, delegation to managers, IPS (investment policy statement) annex.
  • Decide on reserved powers: Limit to what is necessary; route powers through independent persons where possible.
  • Draft variation, decanting, and migration powers: Explicit, measured, and with checks (protector consent, carve‑outs, court oversight where appropriate).
  • Add compliance scaffolding: CRS/FATCA clauses, information rights, confidentiality, AML cooperation, and record‑keeping.
  • Address tax clauses: Reimbursement, gross‑up, withholding, classifications. Cross‑check with tax advisers in relevant countries.
  • Execution pack: Draft deed, trustee resolutions, acceptance of office, protector appointment, letters of wishes, onboarding questionnaires, IPS, and directors’ letters if you hold operating companies.
  • Fund the trust and record: Transfer assets, update schedules, lodge any required notices, and calendar reporting dates.

Case Studies and Lessons

  • Entrepreneur with operating companies: We used a BVI VISTA trust to hold the parent company and a Cayman subsidiary trust to hold passive investments. VISTA insulated the trustee from day‑to‑day management, while an investment committee oversaw liquidity planning for a future exit. The deed’s “office of director rules” let the family’s CFO serve on operating boards without making the trustee a shadow director.
  • Family that over‑reserved powers: A settlor insisted on retaining power to approve all distributions and investments. We redirected that to a protector committee with two independent members and used a detailed letter of wishes. Years later, a creditor challenge failed partly because the trust didn’t look like the settlor’s puppet; minutes showed the committee made real decisions.
  • US/UK mixed family: The deed gave trustees the ability to run parallel sub‑funds, one taxed as a US grantor trust and another as a non‑grantor trust, with distribution filters preventing accidental UK remittances. Variation and decanting powers were used to respond to a later move to Canada without disrupting the whole structure.
  • Philanthropy and governance: A Cayman STAR purpose trust owned the PTC that acted as trustee of the family’s discretionary trusts. The STAR deed set clear purposes—stewardship of voting control, family education, and philanthropy—with an independent enforcer. The line between family benefit and purpose was respected, reducing conflict.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

  • Illusory control by the settlor: Over‑reserving powers, sitting as sole protector, or embedding consent rights that amount to control. Solution: independent protectors, committee structures, and negative consent.
  • Barebones distribution clauses: Vague or conflicting standards lead to disputes and tax uncertainty. Solution: clear discretionary language, default and gift‑over provisions, and spendthrift protections.
  • Missing business‑asset protections: Holding operating companies under a standard discretionary trust without Anti‑Bartlett or VISTA language. Solution: pick the right regime and write explicit powers.
  • Weak succession for offices: No plan for replacing protectors or trustees on death or incapacity. Solution: build a succession ladder and capacity determination mechanism.
  • CRS/FATCA blind spots: Deeds without authority to collect tax information or suspend distributions. Solution: add compliance clauses and onboarding protocols.
  • Perpetuity traps: Appointments that violate the perpetuity period or missing perpetuity elections. Solution: choose jurisdictions with abolished periods or draft carefully.
  • Letter of wishes treated as gospel: Trustees “rubber‑stamp” letters. Solution: state the non‑binding nature and keep minutes that show independent judgment.
  • Funding failures: Trusts never properly settled or assets not retitled. Solution: create a funding checklist and track completion with the trustee.

Governance After Settlement

A strong deed sets the stage, but ongoing governance makes it sing.

  • Letter of wishes: Keep it practical, not encyclopedic. Update after life events. Address principles (education, healthcare, entrepreneurship support) and red lines (no funding for addictions, rules for prenuptial agreements).
  • Investment policy statement (IPS): Agree risk tolerance, liquidity targets, and rebalancing rules with the trustee and managers. If business assets dominate, include a dividend or buyback policy to fund distributions and taxes.
  • Distribution policy: Establish a request process, documentation requirements, and guardrails for large capital payments.
  • Meetings and minutes: Annual or semi‑annual trustee meetings with protectors, investment advisers, and—where appropriate—family representatives. Good minutes are worth more than glamorous brochures in a courtroom.
  • Compliance calendar: CRS/FATCA filings, local filings, asset valuations, insurance renewals, and director rotations for underlying companies.
  • Audit and reviews: Periodic legal and tax health checks ensure the structure matches current law and family reality.

Costs and Timelines You Can Expect

Numbers vary with jurisdiction, trustees, and complexity, but realistic ranges help planning:

  • Setup: Discretionary offshore trust with professional trustee commonly runs USD 10,000–40,000, including advice and onboarding. Add a PTC and you’re at USD 50,000–150,000 depending on licensing and governance.
  • Annual: Trustee administration and filings typically USD 5,000–25,000. PTC governance, audited statements, and multiple underlying companies can take this to USD 50,000+.
  • Timelines: Straightforward setups take 4–8 weeks from initial brief to funding. Complex business assets, multiple jurisdictions, or bank compliance can stretch to 12–16 weeks. Start early if you’re targeting a liquidity event.

Cost‑saving tip: Invest in a thorough scoping memo and information pack up front. It cuts legal back‑and‑forth and shortens trustee onboarding by weeks.

Practical Drafting Tips From the Trenches

  • Write for the reader who will pick this up in 15 years: Future trustees and judges. Clarity beats cleverness.
  • Define classes broadly, then manage with exclusions and letters of wishes. It keeps options open without promising entitlements.
  • Use annexes: Put IPS, dispute resolution protocols, and committee charters in annexes the deed references. They’re easier to update via amendment powers limited to administrative matters.
  • Avoid “shall consider” laundry lists for distributions. They read well and litigate badly. Empower trustees with discretion and a short list of relevant factors instead.
  • Keep protector powers asymmetric: appointment/removal of trustees, veto on major changes, and migration approval. Steer clear of day‑to‑day approvals that look like management.
  • Include a conflicts framework: Acknowledge that protectors or committee members may have roles in family companies and set disclosure and recusal rules.
  • Put illiquid assets on purpose‑built rails: Use VISTA/Anti‑Bartlett, add “no duty to diversify,” and set dividend/exit policies.

A Short, Usable Checklist Before You Sign

  • Jurisdiction chosen for your use case (business holdings, asset protection, duration).
  • Trustee model confirmed (professional or PTC) with service levels and fees agreed.
  • Beneficiary classes defined, with default and ultimate default provisions.
  • Protector committee structured with at least one independent member; fiduciary status clarified; succession plan set.
  • Investment and business holding powers drafted (Anti‑Bartlett or VISTA; delegation to managers).
  • Distribution regime set (pure discretion or HEMS), with spendthrift and no‑contest language.
  • Reserved powers trimmed to what’s defensible; negative consent used where possible.
  • Variation, decanting, partition/merger, and migration powers included with safeguards.
  • Confidentiality, information rights, and CRS/FATCA compliance authority included.
  • Tax clauses tailored (reimbursement, gross‑up, withholding).
  • Execution formalities mapped; initial funding schedule prepared; asset transfer mechanics confirmed.
  • Letters of wishes and IPS drafted and ready; compliance calendar created.

A trust deed is not just a formality; it’s the durable framework that manages money, people, and risk across borders and generations. Draft it with intention, give your trustees the right tools, and keep governance alive after signing. When stress hits—a creditor claim, a tax inquiry, a family disagreement—you’ll be glad you did the hard thinking up front.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *