Offshore banking still carries an aura of mystery, but the reality is more nuanced than the Hollywood version. Classic bank secrecy is gone in many places, yet meaningful financial privacy still exists—if you understand where it lives now, how it works, and the guardrails you must respect. I spend a lot of time helping internationally mobile entrepreneurs, investors, and families choose jurisdictions and structures that prioritize confidentiality without crossing compliance lines. The best results come from combining thoughtful jurisdiction choices with a respect for reporting rules and a clear purpose for privacy.
What “Secrecy” Really Means Now
Absolute secrecy—the kind that shielded assets from any authority—is largely over. What remains is layered confidentiality: banks, service providers, and registries hold information, but it isn’t public and it isn’t automatically shared with every country.
Three big shifts reshaped the landscape:
- Automatic exchange of information has become the default. More than 120 jurisdictions now share account data under the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS).
- Beneficial ownership reporting is the norm. Corporate shells with anonymous shareholders are out; regulators and banks expect to know the real person behind every structure.
- Compliance is king. Long gone are the days when private banks opened accounts based on introductions alone. Today, source-of-funds, tax residency, and purpose-of-account questions are standard.
So where does secrecy still live? In countries with robust privacy laws and bank confidentiality, combined with either limited international reporting, limited public registries, or both. It also survives inside specific asset structures (trusts and foundations) and in the practical frictions that make data hard to obtain.
The Transparency Frameworks That Matter
Before we look at jurisdictions, it’s worth grounding in the rules that govern what gets shared and when.
FATCA: The U.S. Focus
- What it is: The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act compels foreign financial institutions to report accounts held by U.S. persons.
- Why it matters: It triggered the global pivot toward automated reporting. Most banks everywhere now screen hard for U.S. persons because the penalties for non-compliance are severe.
CRS: The Global Net
- What it is: The OECD’s Common Reporting Standard drives automatic exchange of account information between participating countries.
- Who’s in: Over 120 jurisdictions, including Switzerland, Singapore, the UAE, and most classic “offshore” centers.
- What gets shared: Account balances, interest, dividends, sales proceeds—tied to your tax residency, not citizenship.
The raw scale is massive. OECD figures indicate well over 100 million financial accounts and trillions in assets are exchanged each year through CRS. If your home country participates—and you’re tax resident there—assume your overseas bank data will appear on your tax authority’s screen.
Beneficial Ownership Registers
- Public or private: Many countries require companies to disclose ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs). Some keep this data private for regulators, others once made it public.
- A twist in Europe: After a 2022 court ruling, many EU member states restricted public access to UBO registers, restoring a measure of privacy for owners while retaining access for authorities.
Practical Takeaway
Secrecy today rarely means “no one will ever find out.” It means:
- Banks and registries won’t disclose your data to the general public.
- Authorities can access it if there’s legal cause or via automatic exchange frameworks.
- You can still keep your finances out of casual search results, data brokers, and extortionists.
Legitimate Reasons People Still Seek Offshore Privacy
Most clients I see are not trying to dodge taxes. Their motivations are more practical:
- Personal security: Reducing kidnap or extortion risk in higher-crime countries.
- Business confidentiality: Keeping competitors from mapping vendor pricing, margins, or funding sources.
- Litigation resilience: Separating business units or holding assets in jurisdictions with clearer rule-of-law.
- Currency diversification: Holding assets outside volatile banking systems or weak currencies.
- Estate planning: Using trusts or foundations to manage multigenerational assets discreetly.
If your purpose is legitimate, you’ll find high-quality options. If it isn’t, reputable institutions will screen you out.
Where Offshore Banking Still Offers Meaningful Secrecy
Let’s break this into three categories: jurisdictions with strong privacy and strong compliance; places with structural or practical limits on data-sharing; and niche centers where specific structures or legal frameworks create real confidentiality.
1) High-Compliance Jurisdictions With Real Privacy
These are world-class financial centers. They aren’t “secret” in the old sense—they follow CRS, FATCA (as applicable), and AML rules strictly—but your data won’t be public, and law enforcement needs cause to access it.
Switzerland
- What remains: Swiss banking secrecy is alive domestically and for non-CRS situations, but international reporting applies if you’re tax resident in a CRS country.
- Where it shines: Private banking, wealth management, custody of investment portfolios, precious metals, and multi-currency accounts.
- Practical privacy: Numbered accounts still exist but are fully KYC’d. Bank staff are legally bound to confidentiality; breaches are criminal.
- Who fits: Mid-to-high net worth clients who value discretion, stability, and professional portfolio management. Expect minimums in the six-figure range; premier private banks often start at $1–$5 million.
My experience: Swiss banks look for a clear story: source of wealth, tax compliance, investment goals. If you’re a PEP or in a high-risk industry, expect enhanced scrutiny and possible declines.
Singapore
- What remains: Strong privacy laws and data protection culture. Banks are meticulous but not performative; if you’re clean, onboarding is straight.
- Trademark strengths: Asian market access, FX, family office structures, custody, and private banking.
- Privacy in practice: CRS-compliant, but bank confidentiality is rigorous. Non-public UBO details stay within regulatory channels.
- Who fits: Entrepreneurs with Asia ties, family offices, and those who want diversification in a stable, well-regulated hub.
Common mistake: Trying to open accounts with thin substance (no business activity, no team, no Asian trading counterparties). Singapore banks expect credible nexus.
Hong Kong
- What remains: Efficient multi-currency banking and deep capital markets. Strong confidentiality traditions, though politics are a consideration for some.
- Privacy in practice: CRS-compliant; confidentiality is legal and cultural, but the environment is more conservative than a decade ago.
- Who fits: Trading companies with Asia links, investors needing HKD/CNH access, portfolio custody.
Pro tip: For SMEs, regional bank choices and fintech rails can reduce friction. Avoid weakly documented e-commerce businesses—HK banks will push back.
Luxembourg
- What remains: Institutional-grade custody, fund administration, and private banking. An EU base with a discreet profile.
- Privacy in practice: CRS-compliant with non-public UBO registers for authorities. Strong data handling standards.
- Who fits: Funds, holding companies, and UHNW families using European private banking.
Liechtenstein and Monaco
- Liechtenstein: Exceptional for trusts and foundations linked to private banking; small, boutique, and very compliance-driven.
- Monaco: Private banking focus, high relationship standards, and strong confidentiality for legitimate clients.
2) Jurisdictions With Gaps or Practical Limitations in Data Sharing
Here we’re talking about places where, even with modern rules, practical opacity still exists because of policy choices, exchange-network gaps, or the way registers are structured.
The United States (for non-U.S. persons)
- The paradox: The U.S. aggressively collects data on U.S. persons globally (FATCA), but it doesn’t participate in CRS, which means it doesn’t automatically share data about non-U.S. persons with most countries.
- Practical effect: For non-U.S. residents banking in the U.S., there is no CRS-based automatic exchange back to your home country. There can be bilateral exchanges and targeted requests, but not the CRS firehose.
- Banking reality: Many U.S. banks accept nonresident aliens with proper ID and a W-8BEN form, but onboarding can be inconsistent. Some require in-person visits or an ITIN, others don’t.
- Privacy safeguards: Beneficial ownership reporting exists under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) as of 2024—but filings go to FinCEN, not to a public registry. Access is limited to U.S. authorities and, in some cases, financial institutions for KYC.
- Caveats:
- If you earn U.S.-source interest, the bank may report certain payments to the IRS; some information can be exchanged under specific treaties.
- State-level entity registries (e.g., Delaware, Wyoming, Nevada) still offer privacy vs. public searches, but CTA reporting means the U.S. government knows the beneficial owner.
- U.S. enforcement is sophisticated. Don’t assume the U.S. is “blind”—it simply isn’t in CRS.
My view: For non-U.S. persons needing USD banking with strong privacy and legal predictability, the U.S. is a serious option. It’s not a place to hide from law enforcement, but it does provide robust confidentiality from public exposure and CRS reporting.
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
- What remains: Private corporate registries (UBO reporting is to authorities), strong data privacy norms, and high-quality banks in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
- CRS status: Participates in CRS, so expect reporting to your tax residence. However, the ecosystem provides strong non-public privacy.
- Practical edge: Wide range of free zone companies (e.g., DIFC, ADGM, DMCC) with professional service providers and access to international banks.
- Who fits: Entrepreneurs in trade, logistics, consulting, e-commerce with real operations or residency in the Gulf.
Tip from the trenches: Banks in the UAE want substance—tenancy contracts, payroll, invoices. Pure holding companies with no local nexus often struggle.
Caribbean and British Overseas Territories
- Cayman Islands, Bermuda, BVI: Top-tier for funds, captive insurance, and holding companies. Banks are fewer and choosy, but corporate confidentiality is strong, with UBO data kept off public registers while accessible to authorities.
- CRS status: Participating. Don’t expect to hide from your tax authority, but expect robust professional confidentiality and non-public registries.
- Practical reality: Small-business account opening is often harder than people think; relationship banks want established clients, clear source of wealth, and often six-figure balances.
Panama
- Backstory: Post-Panama Papers cleanup tightened AML and reporting. CRS participant now.
- What remains: Private corporate registries (UBOs reported to authorities, not publicly), civil law foundations for estate planning, and a service-provider ecosystem that still values discretion.
- Reality check: Banks are conservative and picky. Many require significant balances or a strong local nexus.
Mauritius
- Niche: Africa- and India-focused investment flows, fund structures, and holding companies.
- Privacy: UBO registers generally not public; data available to authorities. CRS-compliant banks, but a strong confidentiality culture remains.
- Who fits: Funds and corporates with regional strategies; mid-market private clients seeking a well-regulated yet discreet base.
3) Structural Secrecy: Trusts, Foundations, and Account Architecture
Some of the most resilient privacy comes from legal structures rather than the banks themselves.
Trusts and Foundations
- Where: Liechtenstein, Jersey, Guernsey, the Cayman Islands, Cook Islands, and Nevis are well-known for trust law; Liechtenstein and Panama for foundations.
- Why they matter: Properly structured, a trust or foundation can separate legal ownership from control, placing assets under a professional fiduciary’s stewardship.
- Privacy layer: The settlor or founder doesn’t appear on bank statements as the account holder. UBO disclosures usually go to regulators and the bank, not to public registries.
- Caveats:
- Substance and control matter. Sham structures where the founder still pulls every string won’t stand up in court.
- Information may still be exchanged to tax authorities if you’re a reportable person under CRS through controlling-person rules or look-through provisions.
- Trust reporting regimes (like the UK’s Trust Registration Service) are expanding.
What works: If your goal is estate planning and intergenerational stewardship with discretion, a trust or foundation administered in a rigorous jurisdiction is often the best blend of privacy and legitimacy.
Numbered Accounts and Dedicated Custody
- “Numbered accounts” still exist, mostly in Switzerland, but every modern numbered account is fully KYC’d. The number replaces the name on internal screens for staff outside your client team.
- Beneficial owners are known to the bank and (if required) to regulators, but your identity is shielded from broad staff access and certainly from the public.
In my experience, this is the kind of privacy that actually matters day-to-day: tight internal access, limited human touchpoints, and minimal data sprawl.
What Privacy Looks Like in Practice
Think layers, not invisibility:
- The public can’t search your name and find your accounts.
- Vendors, ex-partners, and data brokers won’t see balances or account locations.
- Bank staff beyond your relationship team won’t casually see your identity if you use numbered or highly restricted accounts.
- Regulators can access your data with cause or via automated exchange.
- You remain responsible for disclosing and paying taxes in your country of residence.
If you aim for anything beyond that, you’re setting yourself up for disappointment or worse.
How to Pursue Legitimate Offshore Privacy, Step by Step
1) Define the purpose
- Pin it down: Is this about personal security, estate planning, currency diversification, or business confidentiality?
- The purpose determines the structure. For security and day-to-day banking, a U.S. nonresident account or Swiss private account can work. For legacy planning, think trust/foundation plus custody.
2) Map your residencies and tax obligations
- List every country where you are tax resident or file returns.
- Check which of those countries participate in CRS and what personal reporting you must do.
- If you’re a U.S. person, expect global reporting obligations regardless of where you bank.
3) Choose the jurisdiction category
- High-compliance, high-quality privacy: Switzerland, Singapore, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Monaco.
- Practical non-CRS angle for non-U.S. persons: United States.
- Corporate privacy with CRS participation: UAE, Cayman, BVI, Bermuda, Mauritius, Panama.
- If you need a trust/foundation: match the fiduciary jurisdiction to your banking hub.
4) Select the structure
- Personal account: Fastest to open, simplest compliance, but less separation.
- Company account: Useful for business operations; ensure real substance if you expect smooth banking.
- Trust or foundation: Best for estate/asset protection discretion; slower and costlier to implement, but cleaner separation of ownership.
5) Prepare documentation
- Source of wealth: Company sale agreement, audited financial statements, tax returns, evidence of salary and dividends, real estate sale contracts.
- Source of funds: Bank statements showing the money’s path; invoices and contracts for business inflows.
- KYC/KYB: Certified ID, proof of address, corporate documents, organizational charts, UBO declarations.
Professional tip: Over-document. Good banks appreciate a clean, indexed file. I often include a one-page narrative summarizing the client’s career, wealth path, and account purpose—this helps compliance teams.
6) Shortlist banks and service providers
- Prioritize institutions aligned with your profile: private banks for portfolio custody; transactional banks for operating companies; EMIs/fintech for payment volumes.
- Check minimums: Private banks might want $250k–$2m to start; transactional banks vary widely.
- Validate reputation: Avoid “license mill” banks that attract regulatory heat.
7) Open accounts and execute
- Expect interviews and compliance calls.
- For trusts/foundations, expect deeper dives, including long-form questionnaires and references.
- Timelines: 2–6 weeks for straightforward personal or corporate accounts; 6–12 weeks for structures.
8) Maintain the privacy
- Don’t mix personal and business funds.
- Keep your tax filings current—report foreign accounts and income where required.
- Reassess residency: A move can change your CRS footprint overnight.
- Review access: Limit powers of attorney and keep off account signatory lists if you’re trying to maintain separation via a fiduciary.
Common Mistakes That Blow Up Privacy
- Chasing “no-questions-asked” banks: These are magnets for trouble and often lose correspondent banking or licenses.
- Confusing banking secrecy with tax invisibility: CRS and domestic reporting obligations still apply.
- Overreliance on nominees: Without real control and substance, nominees don’t work and can look like concealment.
- Ignoring activity nexus: Opening a UAE company with no local clients, staff, or vendors and expecting smooth banking is wishful thinking.
- Using shady introducers: If someone promises accounts in a week with “guaranteed approvals,” run. The good banks don’t work that way.
- Neglecting operational security: Privacy is not just legal—it’s also about who has login access, where statements are sent, and how your name appears in vendor records.
Costs, Minimums, and Realistic Expectations
- Private banking minimums:
- Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco: $500k–$5m typical; some accept from $250k.
- Singapore, Luxembourg: $1m is a common entry point for premier service; smaller options exist.
- Corporate and transactional banks:
- UAE: Low formal minimums, but practical expectations around balances and activity.
- U.S. regional banks: Often friendly to nonresident personal accounts; business accounts are more variable.
- Trusts and foundations:
- Setup: $10k–$50k+ depending on jurisdiction and complexity.
- Annual: $5k–$25k+ for administration, filings, and professional services.
- Compliance overhead:
- Budget for annual KYC refreshes, financial statements, and possibly audits for active companies.
If you’re not prepared for ongoing compliance costs, your setup will wither. Privacy with integrity isn’t cheap, but it’s cost-effective compared to the risk of shortcuts.
The U.S. Angle: A Closer Look
For non-U.S. persons, the U.S. is often the most underappreciated “secrecy” jurisdiction:
- No CRS participation: Your U.S. bank won’t automatically send your account data to your home country through CRS.
- Corporate Transparency Act (CTA): As of 2024, most small entities must file beneficial owner information with FinCEN. This database isn’t public, which preserves privacy from the general public while giving authorities access.
- Federal vs. state registers: States like Delaware, Wyoming, and Nevada provide sparse public data on company owners. CTA reduces opacity to authorities but keeps the public in the dark.
- Practical banking: Nonresident personal accounts can be opened with a passport and foreign address; some institutions ask for ITINs, others don’t. Business accounts tend to require more documentation.
Risk management tips:
- Use reputable banks with strong compliance; avoid fringe fintechs with unstable correspondent relationships.
- Keep clean records for your home-country filings; prepare to self-report interest income where required.
- If you earn U.S.-source income, understand NRA withholding and treaty positions.
Europe’s Quiet Privacy Win
The EU’s top court ruled against fully public UBO registers in 2022, and many member states moved to restrict public access. Authorities and regulated institutions still get the data, but the average person, journalist, or data broker can’t freely browse. This change won’t shield anyone from law enforcement, but it restored genuine privacy for owners who don’t want their names plastered on public databases.
Jurisdictions like Luxembourg and some Channel Islands already leaned toward non-public registers; the trend now aligns across much of Europe, within the constraints of AML directives.
The Middle East Playbook
The UAE stands out, but Qatar and Bahrain are quietly building banking infrastructure with private corporate registers and a preference for regional substance. If you’re active in the Gulf or North Africa, having a regional entity with local accounts can deliver both operational efficiency and confidentiality from public searches.
Lesson learned: The more credible your local footprint—office lease, staff, VAT registration—the smoother your banking and the more respectful the relationship with the bank.
Trusts and Foundations: Getting the Design Right
If you’re serious about privacy for family assets, the structure design matters more than the logo on the bank:
- Trustee quality: Choose fiduciaries with deep benches, not a two-person shop. You want continuity, professional indemnity, and rigorous procedures.
- Control balance: Retain too much control and you risk a sham. Give away too much and you’ll hate the arrangement. Protector roles and reserved powers can strike a balance.
- Jurisdiction selection: Cook Islands and Nevis are known for asset protection; Liechtenstein and Jersey for refinement and court sophistication. Match your risk profile and budget.
- Tax alignment: Make sure the structure works in your home country. This often requires advice in both the structure’s jurisdiction and yours.
A good litmus test: If your structure only “works” when no one looks too closely, it’s a liability. If it works when everyone looks, you’ve built the right thing.
Banking Workflows That Reduce Footprints
- Custody plus brokerage: Keep transactional accounts minimal and hold investment assets at a separate custodian. Fewer outgoing payments mean fewer data trails.
- Dedicated SPVs: Separate assets and activities across special-purpose vehicles. Compartmentalization narrows who needs to know what.
- Clean beneficiary communication: Avoid putting beneficiaries as signatories. Use controlled distribution policies to prevent accidental data spread.
These aren’t secrecy tricks—they’re operational hygiene that protects privacy without impeding oversight.
What I Tell Clients About “Secret” Jurisdictions That Pop Up Online
- “New, unregulated banks”: Often EMIs with questionable compliance. Easy to open, even easier to lose.
- “No-CRS countries”: The list is shorter than you think, and banks there may have weak correspondents, currency risk, or political instability. The standout exception is the U.S., for non-U.S. residents—but even there, institutions will know exactly who you are.
- “Anonymous crypto banking”: Serious banks don’t do anonymous anything. Crypto-friendly banks exist, but they demand full tracing of wallet provenance and on/off-ramp flows.
A decent heuristic: If the pitch relies on secrecy as the selling point rather than service, safety, or strategy, it’s not a long-term solution.
Risk Scenarios and How to Mitigate Them
- Data leaks: Even strong banks can be targeted. Use institutions with tight internal access controls and opt out of paper statements and unnecessary mailings.
- Political shifts: Jurisdictions can change rules fast. Diversify across two banking hubs in different legal systems.
- Correspondent banking risk: Smaller offshore banks can lose USD or EUR correspondent lines overnight. Favor banks with multiple correspondent relationships or keep your core liquidity in Tier-1 centers.
- CRS mismatches: Moving countries mid-year can trigger confusing reporting. Keep your tax advisors in sync and document timelines.
Quick Jurisdiction Snapshots
- Switzerland: Top-tier privacy culture, private banking, numbered accounts; CRS-compliant; higher minimums and strong KYC.
- Singapore: Discreet, efficient, Asia-focused; CRS-compliant; expects credible nexus and polished documentation.
- Hong Kong: Deep markets and multi-currency strength; CRS-compliant; conservative onboarding for SMEs.
- Luxembourg: EU hub for funds and private banking; non-public UBO for general public; CRS-compliant.
- Liechtenstein: Boutique trusts/foundations plus private banking; very high compliance; premium pricing.
- Monaco: Relationship-driven private banking; discreet; CRS-compliant; lifestyle nexus helps.
- UAE: Private registries, strong banks; CRS-compliant; needs substance for business accounts.
- Cayman/BVI/Bermuda: Corporate/fund heavy; private registries; banks selective; CRS-compliant.
- Panama: Private registries, civil law foundations; CRS-compliant; banks conservative.
- United States (for non-U.S. persons): No CRS; CTA reporting to authorities only; robust privacy from public eyes; highly regulated and sophisticated enforcement.
A Reality Check on Secrecy vs. Strategy
The winning approach in 2025 isn’t about finding a secret backdoor—it’s about combining:
- A jurisdiction that values confidentiality without grandstanding;
- A bank that fits your profile and purpose;
- A structure that separates ownership from operations where appropriate;
- A compliance plan that keeps your reporting clean and predictable.
With that mix, you’ll achieve the kind of privacy that actually protects you: less exposure to data brokers and opportunists, fewer operational leaks, and a banking relationship built on trust rather than evasion.
Final Thoughts
Offshore secrecy didn’t disappear; it matured. The rough edges—bearer shares, anonymous shells, wink-and-nod account openings—gave way to law-governed confidentiality, sophisticated structures, and smarter information-sharing. If you calibrate your expectations and work within the rules, you can still build a banking setup that’s quiet, effective, and durable.
Start with your goals, respect the reporting regimes, and choose partners who tell you what you need to hear—not what you want to hear. The privacy you keep will be the privacy you’ve designed, not the privacy you’ve stumbled into. And that difference is what keeps clients out of headlines and on plan.