Launching a venture capital fund offshore can be a smart way to access global investors, achieve tax neutrality, and build a structure that scales. It can also be a painfully slow maze if you pick the wrong jurisdiction, misjudge marketing rules, or leave compliance to the last minute. I’ve helped first-time managers and seasoned GPs set up funds across Cayman, Jersey, Guernsey, BVI, Mauritius, and Singapore. The managers who get it right start with a clear investor map, choose structures their LPs already know, and build an operational plan that survives audits, capital calls, and the realities of bank account opening. This guide distills that playbook into practical steps.
Why go offshore?
Offshore fund structures exist for one reason: alignment. They align the tax, regulatory, and operational needs of a global investor base with the investment strategy of the manager. When you’re courting non-US family offices, sovereign wealth funds, and tax-exempt investors (pensions, endowments), an offshore vehicle can remove frictions that onshore-only structures create.
- Tax neutrality: Well-chosen offshore domiciles don’t add extra layers of tax. Profits flow to LPs, who pay tax (if any) in their home jurisdictions. This is critical for multi-jurisdictional investor mixes.
- Familiarity: Many institutional LPs are already set up to invest in Cayman ELPs, Jersey Private Funds, or Guernsey PIFs. Using a familiar wrapper shortens diligence cycles.
- Regulatory efficiency: Offshore regimes for closed-ended funds are designed for private funds. Requirements are known, predictable, and compatible with standard VC terms.
- Flexibility on co-invests and SPVs: Offshore structures make it easier to run co-investments, sidecars, and follow-on SPVs without triggering adverse tax for particular LP cohorts.
When does offshore not make sense? If your investor base is predominantly domestic (e.g., all US taxable) and you invest only in local companies, a straightforward Delaware LP is cheaper and faster. Likewise, if you aim to market broadly to EU retail (rare for VC), a Luxembourg AIF might be more logical than classic offshore. Offshore is a tool, not a trophy.
Core structures you’ll hear about
Master-feeder and parallel structures
These are the two most common blueprints:
- Master-feeder: A Cayman (or other offshore) master fund holds the assets. Two feeders invest into it: a Delaware feeder for US taxable investors and a Cayman feeder for non-US and US tax-exempt investors. This allows each investor cohort to get the right tax treatment while investing in a single pool of assets.
- Parallel funds: Two (or more) funds invest side-by-side into deals with coordinated allocations. You might run a Delaware parallel fund and a Cayman parallel fund, each with its own LPs, feeding into investments directly. This can reduce friction for certain tax positions and simplify side letter variances.
For venture capital, both models are used. If your deal flow is 90% US C-corporations, a master-feeder is common. If you expect many pass-through investments (LLCs/LPs) or complex tax sensitivities, parallel funds plus blockers can be cleaner.
Vehicles you’ll use
- Cayman Islands Exempted Limited Partnership (ELP): The default offshore closed-ended fund vehicle. Flexible LPA, LP liability limited to commitment, no local tax at fund level. Cayman’s Private Funds Act applies.
- Cayman Exempted Company: Common for blockers and, occasionally, for master funds when specific tax outcomes are needed.
- British Virgin Islands (BVI) Limited Partnership: Cost-effective alternative with a lighter regulatory footprint. Useful for SPVs and co-invests.
- Jersey Private Fund (JPF): Streamlined regime for up to 50 professional investors. Strong governance, close to UK/EU time zones.
- Guernsey Private Investment Fund (PIF): Similar to JPF with a fast approval track and supportive regulator.
- Mauritius Limited Partnership (with Global Business Licence): Often used for Africa/India strategies due to treaty access, local expertise, and cost profile.
- Singapore Variable Capital Company (VCC): Not “offshore” per se, but increasingly used in Asia with strong substance and reputational benefits.
The GP is typically a separate entity (e.g., a Cayman ELP’s GP as a Cayman company), and the investment manager might be onshore (US, UK, Singapore) or offshore (licensed locally). Your advisory team structure (investment management agreement sub-advisory) ties the manager to the fund.
Blockers and tax-sensitive sleeves
- US tax-exempt and non-US investors often want to avoid UBTI (unrelated business taxable income) and ECI (effectively connected income). If your fund might invest in US pass-throughs or use leverage, consider a Cayman company blocker for those cohorts.
- VC funds investing in US C-corporations usually avoid UBTI/ECI issues on exits. The risk shows up when you invest in LLCs/LPs, real assets, or distressed credit.
Choosing your jurisdiction
Picking a domicile should be a function of your LP base, deal geography, regulatory constraints, time zone, and budget. Here’s how I guide managers through the options.
Cayman Islands
- Why managers choose it: Global standard for private funds. CIMA (the regulator) has clear rules. LPs know the documents and the process. CIMA statistics indicate well over 14,000 private funds registered—familiarity matters.
- Key requirements: Private Funds Act registration with CIMA; independent annual audit; valuation policy; custodian or “custody alternatives” with safekeeping/record-keeping; AML/CTF program and officers; regulatory filings (including FAR).
- Timeline: 4–8 weeks to register post first close, but allow 8–12 weeks for bank account and provider onboarding.
- Costs: Higher than BVI but competitive given depth of service providers. Expect meaningful legal, admin, and audit spend, especially after first close.
- Good fit: Global LP base, US/Asia deal flow, need for blockers and co-invest flexibility.
British Virgin Islands (BVI)
- Why managers choose it: Cost-effective, flexible LP regimes, fast setup. Strong for SPVs and co-invests.
- Key requirements: Depending on regime, PIF-equivalent options are more limited than Cayman/Jersey/Guernsey, but BVI remains attractive for SPVs and feeder/blocker entities.
- Timeline: Setup is quick; banking remains the bottleneck.
- Good fit: Budget-sensitive setups, SPVs, co-invests, and secondaries structures.
Jersey
- Why managers choose it: The Jersey Private Fund (JPF) is fast, institutional, and LP-friendly. Geographically and regulatorily close to the UK and EU.
- Key requirements: Designated service provider (DSP), AML oversight, limits on investor count (50 professional investors), and compliance with Jersey regulatory codes.
- Good fit: UK/EU-facing managers or LPs; clean governance expectations; EU marketing via NPPR.
Guernsey
- Why managers choose it: The Guernsey PIF is nimble and widely accepted by institutional LPs. High-quality administrators and auditors.
- Key requirements: Regulatory fast track, defined investor eligibility, AML programs.
- Good fit: Similar to Jersey; often manager preference or service provider relationship determines choice.
Mauritius
- Why managers choose it: Treaties and local expertise for Africa/India deal flow, cost-effective staffing to meet substance requirements.
- Key requirements: Global Business Licence, local directors, substance (people and premises) if claiming treaty benefits, FSC oversight.
- Good fit: Africa- or India-focused strategies; where treaty access materially improves after-tax returns.
Singapore
- Why managers choose it: The VCC regime offers top-tier substance and reputational benefits with access to Asia LPs. MAS oversight provides credibility.
- Key requirements: Local fund management licensing or reliance on exemptions; real operational presence.
- Good fit: Asia-focused managers, family-office heavy LP base, or those prioritizing a high-substance hub over classic offshore.
There’s no universal “best” jurisdiction. Start with your anchor LPs: what will they underwrite quickly? That answer settles most debates.
Taxes: achieving neutrality without surprises
I’m not your tax advisor, and you should engage one early. That said, here’s the framework I see working consistently.
- Fund-level neutrality: Use jurisdictions that don’t add tax at fund level (Cayman, BVI, Jersey, Guernsey). Haiti of tax is avoided by design.
- Investor-level alignment: Non-US and US tax-exempt LPs prefer to avoid UBTI and ECI. US taxable LPs prefer a domestic feeder for familiar K-1 handling.
- Blockers: A Cayman exempted company blocker for specific deals (or sleeves) is common if you invest in US pass-throughs or use acquisition debt. For VC investing in US C-corps, blockers are less often needed.
- PFIC/CFC considerations: Non-US investors may have PFIC concerns with certain blockers; US manager-owned blockers may raise CFC questions. Design with tax counsel.
- Carry taxation: Where the GP team sits drives carry tax. US managers need to think about the three-year holding rule and 1061. UK managers should align with HMRC’s carried interest regime. Singapore and other hubs have their own quirks; plan before fundraising.
- Withholding, FATCA, CRS: Get your GIIN, build FATCA/CRS classifications into your subscription workflow, and automate self-certifications with your administrator. LPs care about clean reporting more than marketing decks suggest.
- Economic Substance: Funds are generally out of scope for core substance tests in Cayman and similar jurisdictions, but fund managers and certain holding companies are in scope. If you claim substance, you must evidence people, premises, and decision-making.
Regulatory and marketing rules you cannot ignore
Cayman’s Private Funds Act (PFA)
- Registration: Closed-ended funds must register with CIMA shortly after their first capital call or first investment.
- Audit: Annual audit by an approved Cayman auditor (often a big-four affiliate). Audited financials filed within six months of year-end.
- Valuation: Policy required; independence needs to be evidenced. Many funds use the administrator to perform or oversee fair value adjustments under IPEV guidelines.
- Custody: Either appoint a custodian or implement “custody alternatives” with record-keeping and periodic verification.
- AML officers: MLRO, DMLRO, and AMLCO appointments are standard. Often provided by your administrator or a specialist firm.
US regulatory touchpoints
- Investment Adviser registration: If you advise from the US, you’ll either register with the SEC or rely on exemptions. The venture capital adviser exemption (VC Exemption) is powerful if you truly are a VC per the rule. Otherwise, you may be an Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA) if you advise private funds under relevant thresholds.
- Marketing (Reg D): Most US offerings rely on Rule 506(b) or 506(c). File Form D within 15 days after the first sale to US investors. Run bad-actor checks. If using 506(c), verify accreditation properly, not with a self-attestation.
- Broker-dealer rules: Compensating third-party placement agents requires careful engagement; they must be properly licensed. Paying transaction-based compensation to unlicensed finders is a recurring enforcement trap.
- Blue sky: NSMIA preempts most state review for Reg D, but states may require notice filings and fees.
- ERISA: If US benefit plan investors exceed 25% of commitments in a class, the fund may become subject to ERISA plan asset rules. Many funds draft to avoid crossing the 25% threshold or ensure the GP is ready to comply.
EU and UK marketing
- AIFMD: Offshore funds managed by non-EU managers typically use National Private Placement Regimes (NPPR) to market to professional investors in specific EU countries. Pre-marketing rules and reverse solicitation are sensitive topics—document processes carefully.
- SFDR: If you market in the EU, LPs will ask about SFDR classifications and PAI reporting even if you’re out of scope. Prepare a sensible ESG policy and be honest about data limitations.
- UK NPPR: Straightforward but requires filings and ongoing reporting with the FCA.
Asia-Pacific marketing
- Singapore and Hong Kong: Marketing to professional investors is workable, but if you operate a management entity locally, expect licensing (MAS, SFC Type 9). Family offices are increasingly influential; align your materials with their due diligence expectations.
The fund documents that matter
The fastest closings happen when documents reflect market norms and answers are ready. Your core set:
- Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA): The heart of the deal. Terms to tighten:
- Investment period: 3–5 years, with extensions, plus suspension mechanics.
- Management fee: Typically 2% on committed during investment period, stepping down to invested or cost basis thereafter.
- Carry: 20% is standard, with 100% catch-up after an 8% hurdle in PE; many VC funds run American-style deal-by-deal carry with robust clawback. Increasingly, LPs ask for a European waterfall or hybrid for earlier-stage funds.
- Key person: Ties investment period and new investments to named partners’ time commitments; include cure and suspension mechanics.
- GP clawback and escrow: Aggregate clawback with tax distributions considered. Escrow or guarantees until a threshold is met.
- Excuse and exclude: Sanctions, ESG, or policy conflicts. Make procedures practical.
- Recycling: Clarify what can be recycled (fees/expenses, short-dated proceeds) and for how long.
- LPAC: Define composition, quorum, conflicts review, valuation oversight, and advisory scope.
- Expenses: Draw a bright line between fund and manager expenses. Travel, broken deal costs, compliance tools—be explicit.
- Private Placement Memorandum (PPM): Outline strategy, risks, conflicts, fees, and governance. Resist the urge to oversell; regulators and LPs will hold you to the text.
- Subscription Agreement: Embed AML/KYC, FATCA/CRS, beneficial ownership disclosures, side letter MFN elections, and data privacy consent.
- Side Letters: Keep them tracked in a matrix; maintain an MFN process that’s actually followable. Don’t create operational promises you can’t keep.
- Investment Management Agreement: Between the fund (or GP) and manager/advisor. Sets fees, services, delegation, termination, and indemnities.
- Policies: Valuation, conflicts, AML/CTF, sanctions, cybersecurity, ESG, and expense allocation. Auditors and regulators will ask for these.
The service provider stack
Pick partners who’ve done your exact structure and strategy repeatedly. The A-team:
- Legal counsel: Onshore counsel (e.g., US, UK, or Singapore) and offshore counsel (Cayman, Jersey, etc.). Use firms that work well together.
- Fund administrator: Capital accounts, calls/distributions, NAV, investor reporting, KYC/AML, FATCA/CRS, and audit support. Interview the actual team, not just the sales lead.
- Auditor: A big four or reputable mid-tier with offshore credentials. VC valuation is nuanced—choose auditors who know IPEV and local expectations.
- Tax advisor: Cross-border experience, carry structuring, blocker design, and investor-level sensitivities. Bring them in early on the term sheet.
- Bank: Account opening is the biggest timeline wildcard. Start immediately after entity formation and expect enhanced due diligence.
- Registered office/secretary: Local registered office provider in your domicile. Many also support AML officer appointments.
- Compliance consultant: Especially if operating under a management license or as an ERA/SEC-registered adviser. Build a compliance calendar you follow.
- Directors: For GP companies or boards of blockers/SPVs, consider at least one independent director to strengthen governance.
Fees, carry, and waterfalls that LPs will accept
A realistic economics package avoids both sticker shock and operational complexity.
- Management fees:
- 2% on commitments during investment period, stepping down to invested cost or net invested thereafter is common.
- Young managers sometimes do 2.5% on a smaller first fund; just be transparent on how fees fund the team.
- Fee offsets: 100% offset of transaction fees, director fees, and similar manager-generated income is now standard.
- Hard caps on organizational expenses are welcomed—set a dollar cap, disclose what’s included, and track it meticulously.
- Carry:
- 20% remains typical. Emerging managers sometimes offer 15–17.5% to land anchors.
- Hurdle: 8% is common in PE; many VC funds have no hurdle but may use a soft preferred return or catch-up variant.
- American vs European waterfall: VC often uses American (deal-by-deal) to reward early wins; mitigate with robust clawback, escrow (10–30% of carry), and netting mechanisms.
- Team allocation: Document vesting, forfeiture, and leaver provisions in a carry plan. LPs will ask.
- Other economics:
- Recycling: Allow recycling of certain proceeds within investment period or a capped timeline to optimize DPI without overcapitalizing the fund.
- GP commitment: 1–3% of total commitments is a common range; can be financed carefully (avoid giving LPs the sense you’re borrowing against their fees).
Building the operating model
Timelines
- Structuring and teaser conversations: 1–2 months
- Drafting docs and lining up providers: 2–3 months
- Soft-circled commitments to first close: highly variable; 3–9 months is normal for first-time funds
- CIMA/Jersey/Guernsey registration: Can be concurrent with first close; leave room for regulator queries
- Bank account opening: Start as early as possible; 6–12 weeks can be realistic
Budget
Ballpark numbers vary by provider tier and fund size, but managers often underestimate the total:
- Legal setup (onshore plus offshore): $150k–$400k for a standard master-feeder with side letters; more if complex
- Fund admin: $60k–$200k per year depending on LP count and complexity
- Audit: $30k–$100k annually; first year is often higher
- Regulatory/CIMA fees and filings: Single-digit thousands annually
- AML officers and compliance: $10k–$40k annually depending on delegation
- Banking, KYC, and tech tools: $10k–$50k
Keep 18–24 months of manager runway in your plan, accounting for delays in fee inflows and capital deployment.
Reporting and data
- Investor reporting: Quarterly letters with TVPI, DPI, RVPI, IRR, and meaningful portfolio commentary. Use ILPA templates if your LPs are institutional.
- Valuation: Semi-annual or quarterly fair value marks under IPEV; define methods per asset class (recent financing rounds, market comps, DCF when appropriate).
- Compliance calendar: Form D, AIFMD NPPR filings, CIMA FAR, audits, FATCA/CRS transmissions, AML refresh cycles, and side letter deliverables. Missed deadlines erode credibility.
Treasury and FX
- Capital calls: Give 10–15 business days’ notice. Offer currency options if you have a multi-currency LP base but limit FX risk via defined policies.
- Distributions: Net of reserves and escrow needs; include clean statements that tie to capital accounts.
- FX hedging: If your LP commitments are in USD but investments are non-USD (or vice versa), set explicit hedging policy and governance. LPs dislike surprise FX-driven volatility.
Step-by-step launch plan
- Map your investors
- Who are the anchors? US taxable, US tax-exempt, non-US? What vehicles do they prefer?
- What are their non-negotiables (jurisdiction, hurdle, ESG reporting, MFN)?
- Choose your structural blueprint
- Master-feeder vs parallel based on tax and deal profile.
- Decide on blockers/SPV usage for pass-through investments.
- Pick your domicile and service providers
- Match domicile to LP preferences. Shortlist admin, auditors, banks, legal counsel with relevant track records.
- Draft the term sheet and LPA outline
- Align on fees, carry, GP commitment, investment period, key person, and LPAC. Socialize with anchors early.
- Build the compliance plan
- Determine adviser registration (SEC/ERA/VC exemption), AML framework, FATCA/CRS approach, and AIFMD/NPPR strategy.
- Prepare marketing and diligence materials
- PPM, deck, one-pager, data room with DDQ (ILPA-compliant), track record proofs, valuation memos, and case studies.
- Entity formation and banking
- Form GP, funds, feeders/blockers, and management entities. Start bank KYC immediately.
- Execute side letters smartly
- Keep promises consistent across letters, maintain MFN-ready schedules, and avoid operationally impossible custom terms.
- First close
- Hold first close once you have the minimum viable commitments. Don’t wait for perfection—momentum matters.
- Regulatory filings and registrations
- File Form D, CIMA registration (if Cayman), NPPR filings, and appoint AML officers. Document everything.
- Post-close operations
- Kick off audit planning, set valuation calendar, circulate capital call schedule, and finalize the compliance calendar.
- Rinse and refine for second and final closes
- Expect new side letters, supplemental closings, and updated filings. Keep your version control tight.
Case studies I see repeatedly
- US manager with global LPs: A San Francisco GP raising from US taxables, US endowments, and Asian family offices opted for a Cayman master with Delaware and Cayman feeders. They used a Cayman blocker only for two investments in US LLCs. Result: smooth LP onboarding, one asset pool, and minimal tax leakage.
- UK-based team marketing to European LPs: They launched a Jersey Private Fund with a UK advisory entity under the small authorized UK manager regime. NPPR filings in Germany, Netherlands, and the Nordics. The JPF’s governance and time zone alignment made LP diligence faster.
- Africa-focused VC: Mauritius LP as the main fund with a Singapore advisory office. Substance in Mauritius (local directors and staff), treaty-driven improvements in specific portfolio jurisdictions, and a Cayman SPV for a US co-invest. Investors appreciated the transparent tax narrative and local operational depth.
Common mistakes and how to avoid them
- Picking a domicile your anchors dislike: Ask your top three LPs what they’ve recently approved. Let their compliance teams steer your choice.
- Underestimating bank timelines: I’ve seen deals delayed 10 weeks because the fund couldn’t open an account for capital calls. Start early, over-document source of funds, and consider a backup bank.
- Sloppy expense policies: “We’ll charge the fund whatever’s reasonable” is not a policy. Define broken deal treatment, travel, marketing, software, and third-party diligence explicitly.
- Overpromising in side letters: Custom reporting in three formats, 5-day capital call notices for one LP, ESG reporting that requires portfolio data you don’t collect—these accumulate into operational debt.
- Thin AML/CTF frameworks: Offshore regulators are serious about AML. Appoint competent MLROs, train your team, and use an admin with strong KYC workflows.
- Ignoring ERISA or 25% tests: If you cross thresholds inadvertently, you’ll be managing plan assets without the controls. Track percentages at each close and have exclusion mechanics prepared.
- Fuzzy valuation: Early-stage marks are judgment calls, but they must be consistent and documented. Use IPEV, document methodologies, and socialize with your auditor early.
- Weak cybersecurity and DPAs: LPs will ask about data rooms, encryption, and incident response. Sign data processing agreements with vendors and limit who can download sensitive files.
- Overcomplicated structures: Every extra feeder/SPV/blocker adds cost and failure points. Add only what your investors and tax plan require.
Co-invests, SPVs, and continuation funds
Co-investments are a useful currency in LP relations, but they need structure and speed.
- Co-invest SPVs: Cayman or BVI entities are common. Keep governance simple, fees modest or zero carry with monitoring fee, and align exit mechanics with the main fund.
- Allocation policy: Put it in writing. Define pro rata rights, whether the GP can invite third-party co-investors, and conflicts handling.
- Continuation funds: As VC portfolios mature, GP-led secondaries and continuation vehicles are more common. Offshore vehicles (often Cayman) with third-party valuation and fairness opinions help avoid conflicts. LPs will expect a credible process and choice to roll or sell.
When staying onshore or hybrid makes sense
- All-US LP base and US C-corp investing: A Delaware LP with clean VC exemption and no blockers can be the simplest path.
- Asia-heavy LP base with operational footprint: Singapore VCC is worth serious consideration; it’s not “offshore,” but it meets the same goals with substance.
- EU institutions with AIFMD preferences: Luxembourg partnerships (SCSp) or Jersey/Guernsey alternatives marketed via NPPR can satisfy governance expectations better than classic offshore in some cases.
Match structure to investor reality, not manager ego.
Digital assets and other special cases
If your VC strategy touches digital assets or tokenized equity:
- Licensing: Some jurisdictions require VASP registrations for custody or dealing. Map activities precisely.
- Custody: Select qualified custodians with SOC 2 reports; implement on-chain controls with segregation and address whitelisting.
- Valuation: Expect auditor scrutiny on hard-to-price tokens. Define price sources, liquidity adjustments, and event-driven write-downs.
If you invest in regulated industries (fintech lending, health data), factor portfolio compliance into your valuation and risk processes.
Fundraising strategy and LP diligence
- Anchors first: Secure one or two anchors who validate terms. Offer economics that reward early movers (within reason).
- Placement agents: Use only licensed, reputable agents with verifiable LP relationships in your target segment.
- DDQ readiness: Nail your ILPA-style DDQ, track record tables, attribution memos, and reference calls. Be ready with negative case studies (what went wrong, what you learned).
- ESG and DEI: Even if not Article 8/9, expect questions on ESG integration, adverse impacts, and team diversity metrics. Offer credible, scoped commitments instead of boilerplate.
Practical timelines and sequencing
I’ve found this sequence keeps projects on track:
- Week 1–2: Investor mapping, anchor conversations, jurisdiction decision
- Week 3–6: Entity formation, first-pass LPA and PPM, shortlist admin/audit/bank
- Week 7–10: Side letter negotiations with anchors, bank onboarding, AML/KYC design
- Week 11–14: First close readiness—subscription packs out, Form D prep, regulatory draft filings
- Week 15: First close and initial capital call (small, to cover costs)
- Week 16–24: CIMA/JPF/PIF formalities finalized, audit planning, second close pipeline
- Month 6+: Operational rhythm set—quarterly reports, compliance calendar humming
A lean operational toolkit
- Document management: A secure data room with version control (no “Finalv7clean_REALLYFINAL.docx”).
- Investor portal: Your administrator’s portal or a standalone solution for statements and notices.
- Valuation and portfolio tracking: A lightweight system beats spreadsheets once you hit 20+ positions.
- Compliance tech: Personal trading, gifts/entertainment logs, marketing approvals, and DDQ libraries reduce friction.
- Cybersecurity: MFA everywhere, offboarding checklists, incident response plan, and tabletop exercises.
What a credible first close looks like
- Executed LPAs and side letters for at least your anchors
- Bank accounts funded with initial call; cash controls documented
- Form D filed (if applicable), AML officers appointed, FATCA GIIN obtained
- CIMA or other regulator application submitted (if required post-close)
- Admin live with investor register, capital accounts, and portal access
- Valuation policy adopted and calendar set
- LPAC constituted with a first meeting scheduled
The optics of readiness matter as much as the legal fine print. LPs talk.
A realistic cost and timing snapshot
Here’s a consolidated estimate for a Cayman master-feeder VC fund with 25–40 LPs, a US manager, and a standard co-invest program:
- Pre-launch legal (onshore + offshore): $200k–$350k
- Fund admin setup + first-year: $80k–$150k
- Audit first-year: $40k–$80k
- Banking and KYC: $5k–$20k (fees vary widely)
- Compliance/AML officers: $15k–$30k
- Regulatory fees (CIMA, filings): $5k–$10k
- Total to first close: $350k–$650k, with a long tail over year one
These numbers move with LP count, side letter complexity, and service provider tier. Avoid the cheapest options if you plan to raise Fund II from institutions.
Quick-reference checklist
- Investor mix mapped and validated
- Domicile selected based on anchor LP guidance
- Structure chosen (master-feeder vs parallel) with blocker plan
- Onshore and offshore counsel engaged; admin and auditor shortlisted
- Term sheet aligned with anchors; LPA first draft done
- AML/CTF framework, FATCA/CRS, sanctions controls designed
- Adviser registration strategy set (SEC/ERA/VC exemption)
- AIFMD NPPR strategy documented if relevant
- Subscription pack ready with robust KYC and data privacy consent
- Side letter matrix and MFN process established
- Bank account application submitted; backup bank identified
- First close plan, capital call mechanics, investor portal configured
- Valuation policy and compliance calendar adopted
- CIMA/JPF/PIF filings tracked with target dates
- Communications plan for LP updates and LPAC schedule
Final thoughts from the trenches
The offshore fund launch that runs smoothly shares three traits. First, the structure mirrors investor reality—no more, no less. Second, the team over-invests in operations early: admin selection, AML officers, audit readiness, and banking. Third, they communicate relentlessly with LPs, documenting decisions and never hiding delays. The glamour is in the deck; the durability is in the details.
Treat your offshore setup as part of your product. LPs aren’t just buying your judgment on startups—they’re buying the reliability of your machinery to call capital, value fairly, distribute cleanly, and pass audits. Build that machine right, and fundraising conversations change. You’ll spend less time defending structure and more time discussing the companies that will make your performance.
