Offshore fund management can be a powerful way to pool global capital, centralize operations, and deliver tax neutrality for diverse investors. It can also be a reputational landmine if you underinvest in governance or gloss over regulatory nuance. I’ve helped managers launch and restructure funds across Cayman, Luxembourg, Jersey, Guernsey, Singapore, and Delaware. The best outcomes came from teams that treated offshore as an operating decision first and a tax decision second. The do’s and don’ts below reflect what consistently works—and what too often leads to costs, delays, or headlines you never want.
What “Offshore” Really Means Today
Offshore isn’t a synonym for secrecy. It’s a shorthand for jurisdictions designed to host cross-border capital with predictable legal frameworks. Cayman and British Virgin Islands (BVI) remain mainstays for hedge and private credit master-feeder structures. Jersey and Guernsey are favored for closed‑end private funds with robust governance. Luxembourg dominates EU distribution and institutional mandates via RAIFs, SICAVs, and SCSp partnerships. Singapore’s Variable Capital Company (VCC) is gaining traction in Asia for managers who want substance and regional proximity.
The center of gravity varies by strategy and investor base. Roughly 70% of hedge funds are domiciled in Cayman by fund count, while Luxembourg is the largest fund domicile in Europe by assets, with total fund assets in the 5–6 trillion euro range in recent years. Private equity and venture funds often favor limited partnerships in Jersey, Guernsey, Luxembourg (SCSp), or Cayman. The attraction isn’t simply tax; it’s legal certainty, service provider depth, speed of setup, and investor familiarity.
Two realities shape modern offshore: economic substance requirements (Cayman, BVI, Jersey, Guernsey, and others), and automatic information exchange (FATCA and CRS). Both drove the industry from “post office box” stereotypes to real operations and rigorous reporting. Managers who embrace those realities operate smoothly. Those who try to skate by usually end up paying for it later—with interest.
Core Principles: The Do’s That Separate Good From Great
Do choose the jurisdiction for your strategy and investors, not just tax
Start with your investor map and product strategy. If you’re courting EU institutions, Luxembourg with an authorized AIFM and passporting is often the cleanest route. For a global hedge fund with US taxable and tax‑exempt investors, a Delaware feeder + Cayman master with a Cayman fund (or Irish UCITS for liquid strategies) is more typical. For Asia-Pacific sourcing and family office capital, a Singapore VCC offers substance and regional credibility.
Match legal exemptions to your investor base. US-focused funds often rely on 3(c)(1)/3(c)(7) exemptions under the Investment Company Act. ERISA exposure may push you toward “plan asset” safe harbors or blockers. In the EU, the AIFMD distribution strategy (passport vs. national private placement regimes) drives whether you need an EU AIFM or can operate via non‑EU NPPR notifications. I’ve seen managers burn six months trying to retrofit AIFMD compliance after term sheets were out. Lock your distribution pathway before you draft the first paragraph of your PPM.
Do build a robust governance spine
A credible board or GP advisory framework pays for itself. Independent directors who read the pack, challenge valuation assumptions, and monitor conflicts are an asset, not a checkbox. Expect quarterly meetings with full packs: performance, risk, compliance, AML reports, valuation memo, side letter register, and service provider KPIs. Keep minutes that reflect debate, not just attendance.
Common pitfalls: using nominee directors with 50 other board seats, never refreshing conflicts registers, and letting valuation policies gather dust. For closed‑end funds, make GP‑LP advisory committee mechanics clear: what requires LPAC consent, who votes, and how conflicts (e.g., cross-fund trades, GP‑led secondaries) are adjudicated. If a board or LPAC never challenges you, they’re probably not doing their job—or you’re not giving them enough to work with.
Do get economic substance right
Economic Substance Rules (ESR) in Cayman, BVI, and other jurisdictions require certain entities engaged in “relevant activities” to have adequate local operations. Plain-vanilla investment funds are typically outside ESR, but fund managers and holding companies can be in scope. If your manager claims to conduct fund management business in Cayman or BVI, regulators expect real activity: qualified personnel, local decision‑making, appropriate expenditure, and premises commensurate with scale.
Two tips from costly cleanups I’ve seen:
- If you outsource portfolio management to, say, London or New York, define and document “core income‑generating activities” and oversight roles in the offshore entity. Outsourcing is allowed, but accountability remains local.
- Don’t rely on travel logs alone. Substance isn’t a parade of board meetings; it’s the day‑to‑day management of key activities. Use board minutes, investment committee papers, and service oversight logs to evidence decisions.
Do prioritize investor protection and transparency
Clear offering documents aren’t a marketing tool; they’re risk management. Spell out the strategy envelope, use-of-leverage limits, side pocket mechanics, gates, suspension policies, key person and removal terms, and valuation hierarchy. Don’t sprinkle critical terms into side letters that contradict the PPM. If you grant bespoke rights, either mirror them in the docs or carve them out in an MFN clause with defined scope and timelines.
For reporting, align to what your investors actually need. Private equity LPs expect ILPA-style reporting, fee and expense transparency, and capital account statements that reconcile cleanly. Hedge fund investors want attribution, exposure by factor and asset class, liquidity buckets, and stress tests that match your materials. If your administrator can’t produce that, upgrade or add a reporting layer. It’s easier to onboard a capable admin than to regain investor trust.
Do engineer liquidity honestly
Liquidity mismatch is the fastest route to side pockets, suspensions, and loss of credibility. If you hold private credit, distressed, or concentrated small‑cap positions, monthly liquidity with five‑day notice and zero gates is a trap. Align subscription and redemption terms with asset liquidity plus a buffer for settlements and audit. When in doubt, build in gates (e.g., 10–25% of NAV per period), lock‑ups, or redemption fees to protect remaining investors.
Add stress testing to your monthly routine. Model redemptions against prime broker margin calls, central clearing initial margin, or settlement lags. During 2020’s volatility, well-structured funds with pre-baked gates weathered redemptions; funds that relied on ad hoc board decisions suffered reputational damage even when they survived. Spell out in the PPM what triggers a suspension and who decides.
Do design tax and reporting to be boring (and accurate)
Tax neutrality doesn’t mean tax invisibility. You need FATCA GIIN registrations, CRS classifications, and a functioning investor tax onboarding process (W‑8/W‑9 collection, reasonableness checks, self-certifications). For US-facing strategies, understand PFIC ramifications for US taxable investors and when “check‑the‑box” elections or blockers are appropriate. Private credit and real estate strategies often rely on blocker corporations to manage ECI or UBTI; model the leakage and communicate it upfront.
Other considerations:
- UK investors may require Reporting Fund or DRM (Offshore Income Gains) status for certain vehicles.
- EU withholding tax reclaim optimization might justify a fund platform in Luxembourg or Ireland.
- US GILTI/Subpart F exposure for US owners of CFCs can surprise smaller managers with concentrated GP capital. Get pre‑launch tax modeling for the GP, not just LPs.
Do invest in first-rate service providers
An excellent administrator, auditor, and legal counsel will save you time, money, and aggravation. Evaluate admins on systems (e.g., Geneva, Advent, Efront), investor services, private assets capability, shadow NAV capacity, and error correction policies. For auditors, match firm scale to strategy complexity and investor expectations. Legal counsel should have deep bench strength in your jurisdiction and strategy, not just templates.
Set service levels early:
- NAV timing, tolerance and escalation thresholds, price challenge protocols
- AML/KYC turnaround times and investor onboarding SLAs
- Data delivery formats (APIs, SFTP), report templates, cyber controls
- Fee schedules with caps for extraordinary work
A manager I worked with cut headline admin fees by 20% by switching providers—then spent twice that on internal staff fixing breaks. Cheapest rarely wins in this business.
Do codify valuation policies and NAV controls
Document who prices what, from liquid equities to Level 3 positions. Include sources (pricing vendors, broker quotes, third‑party valuation specialists), stale price procedures, fair value hierarchies, and price challenge thresholds. Run a valuation committee with minutes that reflect genuine skepticism. Back-test model outputs against exits, secondary transactions, or independent marks.
Make the administrator your partner, not your scribe. Provide a monthly valuation package: position lists, broker quotes, liquidity classifications, corporate action confirmations, and private asset memos. Require a signed NAV pack with reconciliations (positions, cash, accruals) and error logs. Define NAV error policies—tolerance bands, investor compensation, and root cause analysis—before you need them.
Do map distribution and marketing rules
Marketing triggers vary. “Pre‑marketing” under AIFMD has specific notice requirements; relying on “reverse solicitation” without evidence is perilous. In Hong Kong, a single meeting can trigger Type 1 licensing issues if you cross certain lines; Singapore has distinct rules for restricted versus authorized schemes. In the US, offering communications can implicate Reg D, Reg S, and the Advisers Act advertising rule.
Build a distribution matrix: country, legal basis (NPPR, passport, private placement), documents required, local legends, and ongoing reporting. Train your sales team and advisors. I’ve seen managers blocked from major European allocators for 18 months over a sloppy pre‑marketing email trail that contradicted their NPPR filings.
Do stress test operations and cybersecurity
Allocators now run cyber and BCP due diligence on par with investment due diligence. Expect questions on privileged access, MFA, vendor risk management, incident response playbooks, and ransomware preparedness. Enforce MFA across all critical systems and require it for your administrator’s portals. Conduct at least annual tabletop exercises involving legal, IT, and operations.
Operational resilience goes beyond cloud backups. Identify key-person risks in the back office, primary and secondary signatories, and cross-training. Keep a runbook: daily controls, NAV calendar, cut-offs, and escalation contacts at your custodian, admin, and auditor. When an admin had a regional outage, the teams that had tested manual trade capture and reconciliation kept functioning; others lost a week.
Do plan exits, wind-down, and investor communications
Design exit paths when you launch. For open‑end funds with less liquid sleeves, define side pocket mechanics with valuation and exit governance. For closed‑end funds, address continuation funds, GP‑led secondaries, and conflict management. Wind-down plans should include final audits, investor K‑1s or equivalents, FATCA/CRS reporting, deregistration steps, and data retention policies.
Communications matter most when things get hard. If you gate or suspend, daily updates beat silence. Provide a timeline, decision rationale, and what you need from investors. LPs forgive market losses; they do not forgive opacity.
The Don’ts That Cause Trouble (and Headlines)
Don’t chase the lowest-tax jurisdiction
Selecting a domicile because “it’s the cheapest” or “no one asks questions” backfires. You’ll pay for the gaps in distribution, service depth, or regulator skepticism. Jurisdiction misfit often means extra structuring layers, increased audit and admin complexity, and harder investor conversations. Tax is a constraint, not the north star.
Don’t ignore substance or beneficial ownership reporting
Regulators have moved firmly against straw arrangements. Failing to maintain substance where required—or to keep accurate beneficial ownership registers—risks fines, struck-off entities, and reputational damage. Use a reputable corporate services provider, but don’t outsource judgment. Review your structure annually to confirm what’s in scope for ESR, UBO filings, and filings such as annual returns or economic substance notifications.
Don’t market without approvals or rely on “reverse solicitation”
Reverse solicitation is not a strategy; it’s an exception. One mis-tagged email newsletter to a German institution can transform a compliant fund into an illegal offering. Keep a CRM record of consents, legends, and distribution permissions. When in doubt, file NPPR notices or appoint an authorized distributor or AIFM to cover the risk.
Don’t use “set-and-forget” offering documents
Products evolve. If you’ve added a private credit sleeve or concentrated positions, update strategy boundaries and risk disclosures. If you adopted a new fee share class or changed your side pocket approach, reflect it in the docs and governance. I’ve seen recoveries claimed by investors because PPMs hadn’t incorporated years of side letter practice and board policies. Treat the PPM as a living tool.
Don’t promise fees that don’t align with work or LP expectations
Opaque fee waterfalls and vague “operating expense” categories trigger disputes and side letter sprawl. In private equity, follow ILPA’s fee transparency and clearly distinguish management fees, fund expenses, and portfolio company charges. In hedge funds, disclose research, data, and technology allocations. If you want to charge for unusual items (e.g., broken deal costs allocations), justify them with policy and practice.
Don’t under-resource compliance and AML/KYC
A single missed PEP or sanctioned investor can cause bank account freezes and regulatory scrutiny. Give your MLRO/AMLCO real authority and tools: screening systems, adverse media, periodic refreshes, and transaction monitoring for subscriptions and redemptions. For high-risk investors, conduct enhanced due diligence with source-of-wealth analysis. Sanctions evasion techniques evolve; your program must keep pace.
Don’t commingle assets or blur custody lines
Commingling client money, even unintentionally, is a career-ending mistake. Confirm cash accounts, subscriber monies, and fund operating accounts are properly segregated with reconciliation daily at the admin and manager. Test asset custody chain of ownership and control. If you prime with multiple brokers, reconcile margin and rehypothecation terms; misreading those can wipe out expected protection in a stress event.
Don’t neglect currency and withholding tax leakage
Cross‑border investing introduces friction: dividend withholding, treaty access, and FX costs. For equity strategies, assess whether treaty‑eligible vehicles (e.g., Lux/Ireland) reduce leakage versus Cayman. Hedge FX thoughtfully; over‑hedging redemptions or capital calls can crystallize losses. Track reclaim cycles and use providers that can automate claims.
Don’t rely solely on side letters
Side letters solve distribution hurdles—but too many bespoke terms create operational chaos and fairness issues. Maintain a central register with filters by topic (fees, reporting, liquidity, transparency) and an MFN comparison tool. Before granting a term, ask if it belongs in the main docs. If three investors asked for the same right, it probably does.
Don’t ignore ESG, sustainability, or sanctions rules
Even if your strategy isn’t labeled “ESG,” regulators and investors care about sustainability risks, greenwashing, and sanctions exposure. EU SFDR classifications affect marketing; misclassification invites regulatory action. Maintain policies on exclusions, climate or social risk management where relevant, and document how those policies influence investment decisions. Align with evolving sanctions regimes (US OFAC, UK HMT, EU) and maintain real-time screening; standing still here isn’t an option.
Don’t hide from regulators or delay self-reporting
When issues occur—NAV mistakes, marketing breaches, AML lapses—self-report promptly with a credible remediation plan. Regulators respond better to proactive managers than to those who get discovered via an investor complaint. A thoughtful root cause analysis and control enhancement roadmap often reduces penalties and builds trust.
Step-by-Step: Setting Up an Offshore Fund the Right Way
1) Clarify strategy and investor map
- Define assets, leverage, liquidity, and target investors by region and type (US taxable, ERISA, EU institutions, family offices).
- Identify distribution pathway (AIFMD passport vs NPPR, Reg D/Reg S, APAC private placement).
2) Choose structure and jurisdiction
- Hedge fund example: Delaware LP feeder for US taxable, Cayman exempted company master, Cayman SPC for strategy sleeves.
- Private equity example: Luxembourg SCSp RAIF with EU AIFM for EU distribution; parallel Cayman LP for non‑EU investors.
3) Assemble the team
- Engage legal counsel in each relevant jurisdiction, fund administrator, auditor, independent directors, tax advisors, and compliance consultants.
- Define scope, SLAs, and tech: investor portal, accounting system, reporting formats.
4) Draft core documents
- PPM or equivalent offering doc, LPA or articles, subscription agreements, investment management agreement, administration and custody agreements, valuation policy, side letter template, AML policy, and privacy notices.
5) License and register
- Register the fund with the local regulator (e.g., Cayman CIMA registration for mutual funds/private funds).
- Consider manager licensing: Cayman SIBL, Singapore CMS, EU AIFM appointment, or reliance on exemptions.
6) Build governance and committees
- Appoint directors or finalize LPAC mechanics.
- Constitute valuation, risk, and conflicts committees with charters and calendars.
7) Stand up compliance and AML/KYC
- FATCA GIIN registration, CRS classification, AML/CTF policy, sanctions screening, investor onboarding workflows, and data retention.
- Appoint MLRO, AMLCO, and DPO (if applicable).
8) Prepare operational playbooks
- NAV calendar, pricing sources, reconciliation workflows, cash movement controls, error escalation protocols, and BCP/DR plan.
9) Tax modeling and elections
- Model blocker structures, PFIC implications, treaty eligibility, UK reporting fund status, and US GILTI/Subpart F exposure.
- Prepare investor tax pack templates (K‑1s for US, equivalent statements elsewhere).
10) Soft launch and refine
- Do a friends-and-family or anchor investor close to road test processes.
- Run shadow NAVs and mock audits. Fix breaks before broad marketing.
Timing and cost: A straightforward Cayman hedge fund can launch in 8–12 weeks if documents are standard and service providers are aligned. A Luxembourg RAIF with an external AIFM often takes 12–20 weeks. All-in initial setup costs vary widely by complexity, but as a rough bracket: $200k–$600k for a hedge master-feeder and $300k–$800k for a closed-end Lux or Channel Islands private fund platform. Ongoing operating costs often land between 20–60 bps of AUM at smaller fund sizes and compress with scale.
Compliance Foundations You Need From Day One
- AML/CTF: Risk-based KYC, beneficial owner identification, PEP screening, enhanced due diligence for high-risk profiles, and periodic refresh cycles (typically 1–3 years based on risk). Document source of wealth for UHNW and corporate structures.
- Sanctions: Real-time screening against OFAC, EU, UK, and UN lists; monitor for sectoral sanctions and ownership aggregation rules (50% rules). Embed in subscription and redemption checks.
- FATCA/CRS: Collect valid self-certifications, validate GIINs, perform reasonableness checks, and file annually. Keep exception management logs for missing or expired forms.
- Privacy/Data: GDPR and other privacy regimes require lawful basis for processing, cross-border transfer controls, and data subject rights response procedures. Investor portals and admin systems should enforce least-privilege access.
- Conflicts of Interest: Maintain a register and resolution procedures for cross-trades, fee allocations, personal account dealing, and GP-led secondaries. Require pre‑clearance for employee trades.
- Marketing/Advertising: Approvals for materials, record keeping of distribution, and periodic sampling for compliance with AIFMD and US advertising rules.
- Training: Annual AML, sanctions, and code of ethics training for all staff, with testing and attestations.
Liquidity, Valuation, and NAV: Practical Controls
Liquidity
- Maintain a liquidity inventory: breakout by instrument, settlement, and expected liquidation time under base and stress scenarios.
- Test gates and lock-ups against redemption simulations. Keep investors informed about liquidity buckets in quarterly letters.
Valuation
- Level 1/2: Primary market data with independent vendor pricing; challenge spreads. Level 3: independent valuation providers at least annually; quarterly internal memos with comps, discount rates, and sensitivities.
- Price challenge log: Document overrides, rationale, and approvals. Review outliers monthly.
NAV
- Reconciliations: Daily cash and positions; monthly total return reconciliation vs. custodian/prime broker statements.
- Error policy: Define NAV error thresholds (e.g., 25 bps investor compensation threshold), remediation steps, and investor communication rules.
- Cut‑offs: Tighten trade capture and corporate action cut‑offs. Late trades create avoidable errors and angry allocators.
Fund Structures: What Works Where
- Master‑Feeder: Common for hedge funds targeting US taxable and international investors. Delaware feeder for US taxable, Cayman feeder for non‑US and US tax‑exempt, Cayman or Ireland master. Efficient from a trading and financing perspective.
- Segregated Portfolio Companies (SPC): Cayman SPCs allow ring‑fenced cells for different strategies or share classes. Useful for platform funds where legal segregation is valuable.
- Unit Trusts: Favored by certain Asian investors (Japan/HK) and for insurance‑linked strategies. Administrator and trustee roles become central.
- Limited Partnerships (LP/LLP/SCSp): Default for private equity, venture, and real assets. Jersey/Guernsey LPs, Luxembourg SCSp, and Cayman ELPs each have strong GP‑LP frameworks and market familiarity.
- Singapore VCC: Umbrella structure with sub‑fund segregation, suitable for managers building substance in Singapore and serving regional investors.
Examples that fit:
- Global long/short equity: Delaware + Cayman master-feeder, with Irish UCITS clone for daily‑liquidity distribution channels if the strategy can meet UCITS constraints.
- Private credit (direct lending): Luxembourg SCSp RAIF with an external AIFM for EU distribution; parallel Cayman ELP for non‑EU LPs; SPV blockers for US tax‑exempt investors to manage UBTI.
- Real assets/infrastructure: Jersey or Guernsey LP with robust LPAC and specialist administrators; co‑investment vehicles alongside the main fund.
Case Studies and Cautionary Tales
- The liquidity mirage: A credit fund offered quarterly liquidity with no gates because “investors prefer it.” When markets tightened, borrowers extended maturities and a 20% redemption queue formed. The fund created side pockets under pressure, and communications lagged. Result: two large institutional redemptions at the next window and multi‑year fundraising drought. Lesson: Build realistic gates and educate investors early.
- The governance rubber stamp: A multi‑strategy fund kept a board on paper while the manager’s CIO approved valuations. A regulatory examination flagged lack of independence and oversight. The remediation included new directors, a formal valuation committee, and restated NAV policies—plus penalties and investor skepticism. Lesson: Governance isn’t theater.
- The substance surprise: A manager “managed” from BVI while all decisions happened in London. During an inquiry tied to a transaction, authorities questioned ESR compliance. The manager spent months reconstructing decision evidence and ultimately built real operations on‑island—at a far higher cost than planning substance from day one. Lesson: Either own the location or don’t claim it.
- The marketing misstep: A pre‑marketing deck got forwarded to a German pension without proper NPPR filings. The allocator liked the strategy but was barred from investing for at least a year due to a compliance incident. Lesson: Distribution rules aren’t suggestions.
Budgeting and Fee Economics
Operating budgets sink small funds that try to look big while charging low fees. Typical annual line items for a hedge fund platform under $250 million AUM:
- Administrator: $120k–$300k depending on complexity and frequency, plus per‑investor charges
- Auditor: $75k–$200k, higher for multi‑jurisdiction or complex Level 3 assets
- Directors: $30k–$100k per director per year
- Legal and compliance: $100k–$250k ongoing (plus transaction‑related spikes)
- Custody/Prime brokerage: Embedded in trading costs; watch collateral and financing spreads
- Data/Tech: $150k–$500k+ for market data, OMS/PMS, cybersecurity, investor portals
- Insurance (D&O/E&O/PI): $50k–$200k+
Expense caps help early-stage funds but can cripple margins if mis-set. Model break-even AUM under conservative management fee and reasonable OPEX. For private equity, fee offsets and transaction fees need transparent policies. Build in co‑invest administration costs; they’re real and often underestimated.
Technology and Data: Modernize the Offshore Back Office
Modern fund operations are data businesses. Pair an OMS/PMS with robust accounting (Geneva, Efront, Allvue, or peers) and enforce straight‑through processing. Use APIs or SFTP for data feeds between manager, admin, and custodian to reduce manual keying. Investor portals with two‑factor authentication, encrypted statements, and self‑service tax forms reduce operational drag and risk.
For compliance, implement:
- Screening tools that integrate with onboarding to prevent manual re‑entry of data
- Archive solutions that capture all deal, chat, and email communications as required by jurisdictional rules
- Automated regulatory reporting where feasible (Annex IV, Form PF, FATCA/CRS), with human review before filing
Back‑office teams shouldn’t be firefighters every month-end. Target a steady cadence with checklists, owner accountability, and continuous improvement after each close.
Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
- Over-engineering structures: Extra blockers and SPVs add cost and confusion. Start with the simplest structure that meets investor, tax, and regulatory needs; add layers only for clear benefits.
- Ignoring FX in performance and operations: Currency exposures can erode returns or create NAV whiplash. Establish a currency hedging policy and disclose it.
- Underestimating investor ops: Late K‑1s or sloppy capital statements frustrate LPs. Map reporting deadlines backward from investor needs.
- Side letter sprawl: Set a governance process for side letters with legal, compliance, operations, and investor relations sign‑off.
- Documentation drift: Monthly “temporary” practices become permanent. Re-base your offering docs annually to reflect reality.
Due Diligence Questions You Should Be Able to Answer
- Governance: Who challenges valuations? Show me minutes with disagreements.
- Liquidity: How would a 15% quarterly redemption impact portfolio liquidation and financing?
- Tax: How do you manage UBTI/ECI for tax‑exempt investors? What’s the modeled leakage across structures?
- Compliance: Walk me through your AML escalations in the past 12 months and outcomes.
- Cyber: What was your last tabletop scenario, and what changed afterward?
- Operations: What’s your NAV error rate over the last year, and how did you remediate?
If you can answer these crisply with documentation, you’re ahead of most managers I meet.
Checklist: Quick Do’s and Don’ts Summary
Do
- Match jurisdiction to investor base and distribution strategy
- Build real governance with independent oversight and documented decisions
- Align liquidity terms with asset reality and stress test regularly
- Stand up rigorous tax onboarding, FATCA/CRS, and reporting
- Hire strong, scalable service providers and set SLAs early
- Document valuation policies, run pricing committees, and back-test
- Control marketing and pre‑marketing across jurisdictions
- Invest in cybersecurity, BCP, and vendor risk management
- Plan exits, wind‑downs, and continuation options at launch
- Communicate transparently, especially under stress
Don’t
- Select domiciles purely for tax or cost savings
- Ignore economic substance or beneficial ownership obligations
- Rely on reverse solicitation as your distribution plan
- Let offering documents trail actual practice
- Hide fees in vague expense categories
- Underfund compliance, AML/KYC, or sanctions programs
- Comingle cash or blur custody responsibilities
- Forget FX and withholding tax leakage in returns
- Drown in side letters without MFN and policy alignment
- Delay self-reporting or remediation when issues arise
Final Thoughts
Offshore fund management succeeds when you treat it as a disciplined operating platform—clear governance, honest liquidity, reliable NAVs, and transparent reporting. The right jurisdiction and structure amplify your strategy; the wrong choices multiply friction. Investors today perform deep operational due diligence alongside performance analysis. If your fund can demonstrate thoughtful design, clean controls, and steady communication, you’ll stand out for the right reasons.
Leave a Reply